📅 28 November, 2018
Design is easily misinterpreted based on different use cases
In this specific case our customer wanted to manually add each of her existing clients to PaymentLink, so she clicked on the client’s tab and looked for an “Add Client” button. Seems logical. However, that isn’t an option. The product assumes that clients are entering their information themselves (because they have sensitive credit card details) so in order to add a new client from within your own account, you need to act as the client would. Not really a problem, but without a guide, this expectation could become a real roadblock to adoption.
Potential Improvement: Provide a clear explanation of how to migrate existing clients along with supporting documentation in the empty state of the client’s tab.
Your user’s workflows don’t end at the edge of your product This customer already uses many tools besides PaymentLink to run their business. Bench for accounting, Asana for project management and Gmail for client communication to name a few. Observing a user’s thought process for how this new tool will co-exist within their existing ecosystem raised several clear topics that could be better covered by help documentation and in-app prompts.
Potential Improvement: Create walkthroughs of how existing workflows can be integrated with the product and provide clear links at relevant points in the experience.
Blank form fields increase cognitive load One of the critical tasks to getting value from PaymentLink is creating and sharing a link. To do that users must fill in a total of 6 form fields. Despite this being a critical and seemingly straightforward step our new customer froze.
This was the first time they were being asked to enter something that would be shown to their own clients. The stakes got a little higher and they began to ask questions. Not about how the product worked but about best practices for setting expectations with clients and how to convey that clients payment methods will be saved securely. Being on the call I was able to provide suggestions and overcome the barrier.
Another advantage of watching in real time is being able to identify what environment the customer is in while trying to complete a task. In this case, they were at their desk on a laptop and had quick access to previous expectation settings emails they had sent to clients.
If they’d been experiencing this pain point by themselves while using their phone on a crowded train the outcome would likely have been different. They may have used dummy copy (and not actually used the link with clients) or worse decided to wait until later (maybe never to return).
Potential Improvement: Provide swipe-copy that can be quickly inserted to fit common use cases and allow users to maintain momentum.
Understanding the context of what a user was trying to achieve at the point of failure can help inform product improvements, behavior driven messaging, help documentation and ultimately increase the rate of customer activation and retention.
New stories, learnings, and tips for building better products straight to your inbox.